Gardening tips, gardening info and heaps of ideas to help gardeners of all experience get more out of their hobby and out of their gardens.
Val Bourne from the UK's Telegraph has boldly gone where no other garden journalist would dare tread - creating her list of the Top 100 Plants Every Garden Should Have. The reason it's bold; a list of must-haves is incredibly biased to personal choice. Not to mention that many of these plants aren't available for most of the world's gardeners or they won't grow outside of the UK's climate.
All that aside, this is a great list and if you've some spare time to indulge in a little garden porn then flicking through the gallery of each plant is worth your while.
Val has broken the Top 100 down for each season. Eryngium giganteum, Knautia macedonica and Astrantia major 'Roma' for the summer garden while Galanthus 'S. Arnott' and Perovskia atriplicifolia 'Blue Spire' will brighten your winter blues. Not to mention 25 must-haves for both Spring and Autumn this list of 100 is sheer delight.
BTW - just for the record, of the 100 plants Val listed I only have a solitary 1 growing in my garden - Gaura lindheimeri. I feel so inadequate (sniff!..)
Comments
Don't worry Stuart. I could only count Cyclamen from that list. Does this mean I'm not in the cool crowd? : )
Sean
Posted by: Sean | February 18, 2008 1:27 PM
I made a list too. But I made sure I said plants I love and how great they did in my garden. I have worked at a garden center for so long that I know it's growing conditions that make a plant work or not. It's all about soil. I can grow most anything--but don't always like it. I like how you first stated that a list is personal choice. I've given Gaura to two people who have killed it....lol...so they took that off their list.
Posted by: Anna | February 18, 2008 2:32 PM
Entertaining list, and I have quite a few--though some are only annuals for us. But yes, plants are so darn personal--I might think the whole world would love to grow Erysimum planum (a bumblebee magnet if ever there was one) but it's not going to flourish for every gardener in Nova Scotia, let alone the world. And being a bit of a rebel, I get pissy when someone tells me I "should" have or do anything...
Posted by: jodi | February 18, 2008 2:54 PM
Another comment, because I'm still running experiments with browsers. Firefox forgets my info everytime I log into your website to leave a comment. I'm now checking to see if Safari remembers--it does other places.
I can ask my whiz-son about the stretching of avatars in Safari if you'd like, Stuart. He might have some ideas because he eats this stuff for breakfast.
Posted by: jodi | February 18, 2008 2:57 PM
One more, then I'm really off--I'm amazed at the prices of the reader offers--they're mind-marinatingly expensive, if my calculations are correct and a British pound is worth about 2.50 Canadian dollars (that's this week--with the wind blowing from the east). How on earth would a gardener starting out be able to afford all of the plants, given the prices they are giving in their "offers"?
Posted by: jodi | February 18, 2008 3:00 PM
Very opinionated list, we have several of these plants, others that are not the cultivar mentioned, does that count? So want to be fashionable...NOT
Frances at Faire Garden
Posted by: Frances | February 19, 2008 12:47 AM
The best plants are the ones that grow well in your garden, Stuart, so quit your sniffing, cause I've seen your gorgeous selection !
This list would never "Play in Peoria " ( a small town ) as we say in Chicago.
It's great though to be so opionated, isn't it?
Posted by: carolyn | February 19, 2008 2:02 AM
This is a very comprehensive list! To me, the must-have plants are any that will actually "bloom where they're planted", especially with our fickle Maritime clime. :)
Posted by: Nancy Bond | February 20, 2008 11:36 PM
We all love lists. Here in California, the list would have to include plants which are native to the area or at least require very little water to live. When I moved here eight years ago, I read an article by a local garden guru. The point was to have California gardeners quit thinking they should have an English garden. We don't have the luxury of rain, fog, and mist found in GB. An English garden in California requires too much water which we do not have an excess of. (Most of our water in Southern California is brought in from surrounding states.) So I think it would be interesting to see a list like this created for all the areas around the world.
Posted by: Peggy | February 21, 2008 11:47 AM